2016 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis

Estándar

B. Combe et al.

Abstract

Objectives Since the 2007 recommendations for the management of early arthritis have been presented, considerable research has been published in the field of early arthritis, mandating an update of the 2007 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for management of early arthritis.

Methods In accordance with the 2014 EULAR Standardised Operating Procedures, the expert committee pursued an approach that was based on evidence in the literature and on expert opinion. The committee involved 20 rheumatologists, 2 patients and 1 healthcare professional representing 12 European countries. The group defined the focus of the expert committee and target population, formulated a definition of ‘management’ and selected the research questions. A systematic literature research (SLR) was performed by two fellows with the help of a skilled librarian. A set of draft recommendations was proposed on the basis of the research questions and the results of the SLR. For each recommendation, the categories of evidence were identified, the strength of recommendations was derived and the level of agreement was determined through a voting process.

Results The updated recommendations comprise 3 overarching principles and 12 recommendations for managing early arthritis. The selected statements involve the recognition of arthritis, referral, diagnosis, prognostication, treatment (information, education, pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions), monitoring and strategy. Eighteen items were identified as relevant for future research.

Conclusions These recommendations provide rheumatologists, general practitioners, healthcare professionals, patients and other stakeholders with an updated EULAR consensus on the entire management of early arthritis.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210602

Review: Preclinical Rheumatoid Arthritis: Progress Toward Prevention

Estándar
  1. Kulveer Mankia and
  2. Paul Emery†,*
Arthritis & Rheumatology

Volume 68, Issue 4, pages 779–788, April 2016

Introduction

Starting therapy early leads to better outcomes for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Early initiation of disease-modifying treatments is associated with less joint damage and increased chances of achieving remission. But what is early disease? Conventionally, this is taken to mean the initial phase after arthritis becomes clinically detectable. However, recent studies have challenged this presumption and have suggested that disease processes become established in the preclinical period, a phase often described as pre-RA. The corollary of this represents a paradigm shift; clinical arthritis is not the beginning of the disease but is, instead, the culmination of a whole series of well-established pathologic events.

In this review, we provide an overview of the preclinical phases of RA, with special focus on recent advances in the field. Specifically, we will review evidence suggesting that localized autoimmunity may be an important trigger in preclinical disease, an area attracting growing research interest. Newly characterized immunologic and imaging biomarkers and their significance in prospective cohorts will also be discussed. Finally, the clinical features and management of individuals at-risk of developing RA are also described.

Defining pre-RA: classification of at-risk individuals

Many important pathologic events occur before RA becomes clinically manifest. In order to standardize the terminology for the phases leading up to and including RA, the European League Against Rheumatism Standing Committee on Investigative Rheumatology devised a recommendation for nomenclature [1]. Six phases of RA development were agreed upon (Figure 1). The categories are genetic and environmental risk factors for RA (phases A and B, respectively), systemic autoimmunity associated with RA (phase C), symptoms without clinical arthritis (phase D), and both undifferentiated arthritis and RA (phases E and F, respectively). The proposed categories are intended as a broad framework based on the current understanding of the etiology of RA. It is clear that individuals may not necessarily progress through all phases, and that individual phases are not mutually exclusive. Importantly, although individuals are at risk of RA, the terms preclinical RA and pre-RA should only be used retrospectively, as many at-risk individuals will never develop clinical arthritis or RA. This is especially true for individuals in phases A and B who are healthy individuals with risk factors that may never translate into pathologic processes.

Keep reading in the Journal. Open Access